1981 Opel Ascona vs. 1996 Renault Clio
To start off, 1996 Renault Clio is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 136 more horse power than 1981 Opel Ascona. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1981 Opel Ascona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Clio weights approximately 600 kg more than 1981 Opel Ascona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Clio (407 Nm) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Opel Ascona. (154 Nm). This means 1996 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Opel Ascona.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Opel Ascona | 1996 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Opel | Renault |
| Model | Ascona | Clio |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 250 HP |
| Torque | 154 Nm | 407 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2490 mm |
