1981 Opel Rekord vs. 2010 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2010 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Opel Rekord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Opel Rekord would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 896 kg more than 1981 Opel Rekord.
Because 2010 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Opel Rekord. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Toyota 4Runner has automatic transmission and 1981 Opel Rekord has manual transmission. 1981 Opel Rekord will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Toyota 4Runner will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Opel Rekord | 2010 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Opel | Toyota |
| Model | Rekord | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1689 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1996 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4823 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1925 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1816 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2789 mm |
