1981 Plymouth Reliant vs. 2006 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2006 Subaru Forester is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Plymouth Reliant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Plymouth Reliant would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Plymouth Reliant is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Subaru Forester weights approximately 481 kg more than 1981 Plymouth Reliant.
Because 2006 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Plymouth Reliant. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Plymouth Reliant | 2006 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Plymouth | Subaru |
Model | Reliant | Forester |
Year Released | 1981 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2457 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 227 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1152 kg | 1633 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2530 mm |