1981 Reliant SE6 vs. 2009 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Volvo C70 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Reliant SE6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Reliant SE6 would be higher. At 2,994 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Reliant SE6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo C70 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1981 Reliant SE6. (133 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1981 Reliant SE6.
Because 1981 Reliant SE6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Reliant SE6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo C70 (236 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Reliant SE6. (233 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Reliant SE6.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Reliant SE6 | 2009 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Reliant | Volvo |
Model | SE6 | C70 |
Year Released | 1981 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2994 cc | 2521 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 224 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 233 Nm | 236 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1840 mm |