1981 Renault 18 vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Renault 18. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Renault 18 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Renault 18 (80 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (74 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Renault 18 should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 585 kg more than 1981 Renault 18.
Because 2000 Toyota Celica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Renault 18. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (622 Nm) has 485 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Renault 18. (137 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Renault 18.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Renault 18 | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | 18 | Celica |
Year Released | 1981 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1647 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 622 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1025 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1280 mm |