1981 Renault 20 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Renault 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Renault 20 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 1981 Renault 20 has manual transmission. 1981 Renault 20 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Renault 20 | 2012 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Renault | Chevrolet |
Model | 20 | Malibu |
Year Released | 1981 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1645 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 169 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4872 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2852 mm |