1981 Renault 9 vs. 1980 Volvo 260
To start off, 1981 Renault 9 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 260 (146 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1981 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 260 should accelerate faster than 1981 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 260 weights approximately 530 kg more than 1981 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Renault 9 | 1980 Volvo 260 | |
| Make | Renault | Volvo |
| Model | 9 | 260 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 2664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 146 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 73 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2660 mm |
