1981 Renault 9 vs. 2002 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2002 Smart ForTwo is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Renault 9 would be higher. At 1,108 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Renault 9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Renault 9 (47 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2002 Smart ForTwo. (40 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Renault 9 should accelerate faster than 2002 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Renault 9 weights approximately 15 kg more than 2002 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Renault 9 | 2002 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Renault | Smart |
| Model | 9 | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 799 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 40 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 65.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 18.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 805 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1520 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 1820 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 22 L |
