1981 Seat 127 vs. 2002 Acura RL
To start off, 2002 Acura RL is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Seat 127. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Seat 127 would be higher. At 3,472 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RL (225 HP) has 178 more horse power than 1981 Seat 127. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 1981 Seat 127. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura RL weights approximately 970 kg more than 1981 Seat 127. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura RL (313 Nm) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Seat 127. (63 Nm). This means 2002 Acura RL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Seat 127.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Seat 127 | 2002 Acura RL | |
Make | Seat | Acura |
Model | 127 | RL |
Year Released | 1981 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 901 cc | 3472 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 225 HP |
Torque | 63 Nm | 313 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 705 kg | 1675 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2920 mm |