1981 Seat 127 vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Seat 127. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Seat 127 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1981 Seat 127. (47 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1981 Seat 127. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 380 kg more than 1981 Seat 127. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Seat 127. (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Seat 127.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Seat 127 | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Seat | Mazda |
Model | 127 | 3 |
Year Released | 1981 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 901 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 63 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 705 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2650 mm |