1981 Seat 131 vs. 2002 Acura RL

To start off, 2002 Acura RL is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Seat 131. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Seat 131 would be higher. At 3,472 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RL (225 HP) has 172 more horse power than 1981 Seat 131. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 1981 Seat 131. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura RL weights approximately 710 kg more than 1981 Seat 131. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1981 Seat 131 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Seat 131. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura RL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura RL (313 Nm) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Seat 131. (94 Nm). This means 2002 Acura RL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Seat 131. 2002 Acura RL has automatic transmission and 1981 Seat 131 has manual transmission. 1981 Seat 131 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Acura RL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: