1981 Seat 131 vs. 2010 Dodge Caliber
To start off, 2010 Dodge Caliber is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Seat 131. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Seat 131 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Caliber is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Caliber (158 HP) has 105 more horse power than 1981 Seat 131. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Caliber should accelerate faster than 1981 Seat 131.
Because 1981 Seat 131 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Seat 131. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Caliber, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Caliber (191 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Seat 131. (94 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2010 Dodge Caliber will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Seat 131.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Seat 131 | 2010 Dodge Caliber | |
Make | Seat | Dodge |
Model | 131 | Caliber |
Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 158 HP |
Torque | 94 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4415 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1748 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1534 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2634 mm |