1981 Seat Ritmo vs. 2010 Peugeot 307
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 307 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Peugeot 307 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 307 (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1981 Seat Ritmo. (63 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 307 should accelerate faster than 1981 Seat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Peugeot 307 weights approximately 324 kg more than 1981 Seat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Peugeot 307 (200 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Seat Ritmo. (92 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Peugeot 307 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Seat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Seat Ritmo | 2010 Peugeot 307 | |
Make | Seat | Peugeot |
Model | Ritmo | 307 |
Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1197 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 92 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 882 kg | 1206 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2610 mm |