1981 Seat Ronda vs. 1972 ZIL 114

To start off, 1981 Seat Ronda is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 ZIL 114. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 ZIL 114 would be higher. At 6,959 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 ZIL 114 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 ZIL 114 (296 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 243 more horse power than 1981 Seat Ronda. (53 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 ZIL 114 should accelerate faster than 1981 Seat Ronda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 ZIL 114 weights approximately 2225 kg more than 1981 Seat Ronda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1972 ZIL 114 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 ZIL 114. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Seat Ronda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 ZIL 114 (580 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 482 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Seat Ronda. (98 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1972 ZIL 114 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Seat Ronda.

Compare all specifications: