1981 Seat Ronda vs. 1977 Volvo 66
To start off, 1981 Seat Ronda is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,714 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Seat Ronda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Volvo 66 (56 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1981 Seat Ronda. (53 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Volvo 66 should accelerate faster than 1981 Seat Ronda.
Because 1977 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Seat Ronda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Seat Ronda (98 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1981 Seat Ronda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Seat Ronda | 1977 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Seat | Volvo |
Model | Ronda | 66 |
Year Released | 1981 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1714 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 98 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 20.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1550 mm |