1981 Simca 2 Litres vs. 2012 Ford Explorer
To start off, 2012 Ford Explorer is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Simca 2 Litres. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Simca 2 Litres would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Explorer weights approximately 942 kg more than 1981 Simca 2 Litres.
Because 1981 Simca 2 Litres is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Simca 2 Litres. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford Explorer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Ford Explorer has automatic transmission and 1981 Simca 2 Litres has manual transmission. 1981 Simca 2 Litres will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Ford Explorer will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Simca 2 Litres | 2012 Ford Explorer | |
Make | Simca | Ford |
Model | 2 Litres | Explorer |
Year Released | 1981 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1981 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 290 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 2067 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5006 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2004 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1788 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2860 mm |