1981 Skoda L vs. 2005 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 2005 Suzuki Swift is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Skoda L would be higher. At 1,490 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Suzuki Swift is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Suzuki Swift (100 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1981 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki Swift should accelerate faster than 1981 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Suzuki Swift weights approximately 250 kg more than 1981 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Suzuki Swift (133 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Suzuki Swift will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Skoda L | 2005 Suzuki Swift | |
| Make | Skoda | Suzuki |
| Model | L | Swift |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1044 cc | 1490 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Torque | 74 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1075 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 45 L |
