1981 Skoda L vs. 2005 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2005 Toyota Matrix is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Skoda L would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Matrix (123 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1981 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1981 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 520 kg more than 1981 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Matrix (161 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Skoda L. (74 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Skoda L | 2005 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Skoda | Toyota |
Model | L | Matrix |
Year Released | 1981 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1044 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 74 Nm | 161 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 91 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1345 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 45 L |