1981 Subaru Rex vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Subaru Rex. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Subaru Rex would be higher. At 1,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ecosport (67 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1981 Subaru Rex. (29 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1981 Subaru Rex.
Because 1981 Subaru Rex is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Subaru Rex. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Subaru Rex | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Subaru | Ford |
Model | Rex | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1981 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 544 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 29 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1930 mm | 2490 mm |