1981 Suzuki Alto vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V

To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Suzuki Alto. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Suzuki Alto would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V (548 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 510 more horse power than 1981 Suzuki Alto. (38 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1981 Suzuki Alto. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 1304 kg more than 1981 Suzuki Alto. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac CTS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Suzuki Alto, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V (747 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 687 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Suzuki Alto. (60 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Suzuki Alto.

Compare all specifications:

1981 Suzuki Alto 2013 Cadillac CTS-V
Make Suzuki Cadillac
Model Alto CTS-V
Year Released 1981 2013
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 796 cc 6200 cc
Engine Cylinders 3 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 38 HP 548 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 6100 RPM
Torque 60 Nm 747 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 68.5 mm 103 mm
Engine Stroke Size 72 mm 92 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 9.1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 610 kg 1914 kg
Vehicle Length 3300 mm 4859 mm
Vehicle Width 1410 mm 1884 mm
Vehicle Height 1340 mm 1422 mm
Wheelbase Size 2160 mm 2880 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]