1981 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2012 Jeep Compass

To start off, 2012 Jeep Compass is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jeep Compass (158 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1981 Suzuki Fronte. (29 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1981 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Jeep Compass weights approximately 854 kg more than 1981 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jeep Compass (191 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Suzuki Fronte. (41 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Suzuki Fronte.

Compare all specifications:

1981 Suzuki Fronte 2012 Jeep Compass
Make Suzuki Jeep
Model Fronte Compass
Year Released 1981 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 543 cc 2000 cc
Engine Cylinders 3 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 29 HP 158 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 41 Nm 191 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 5000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual 5-speed manual
Vehicle Weight 555 kg 1409 kg
Vehicle Length 3200 mm 4448 mm
Vehicle Width 1400 mm 1814 mm
Vehicle Height 1340 mm 1651 mm
Wheelbase Size 2160 mm 2634 mm