1981 Suzuki LJ 50 vs. 2003 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Suzuki LJ 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Suzuki LJ 50 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 880 kg more than 1981 Suzuki LJ 50.
Because 1981 Suzuki LJ 50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Suzuki LJ 50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1981 Suzuki LJ 50 has manual transmission. 1981 Suzuki LJ 50 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Suzuki LJ 50 | 2003 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Suzuki | Cadillac |
| Model | LJ 50 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 797 cc | 2597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 179 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1940 mm | 2890 mm |
