1981 Suzuki LJ 50 vs. 2012 Ford Ka
To start off, 2012 Ford Ka is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Suzuki LJ 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Suzuki LJ 50 would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Ka weights approximately 226 kg more than 1981 Suzuki LJ 50.
Because 1981 Suzuki LJ 50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Ford Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Suzuki LJ 50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Suzuki LJ 50 | 2012 Ford Ka | |
Make | Suzuki | Ford |
Model | LJ 50 | Ka |
Year Released | 1981 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 797 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1940 mm | 2450 mm |