1981 Suzuki SJ 410 vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Suzuki SJ 410. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Suzuki SJ 410 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 316 more horse power than 1981 Suzuki SJ 410. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1981 Suzuki SJ 410.
Because 1981 Suzuki SJ 410 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Suzuki SJ 410 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Suzuki SJ 410. (75 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Suzuki SJ 410.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Suzuki SJ 410 | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Suzuki | Holden |
| Model | SJ 410 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 970 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 360 HP |
| Torque | 75 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
