1981 Toyota Blizzard vs. 2011 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2011 Ford Ecosport is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Toyota Blizzard. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Toyota Blizzard would be higher. At 2,188 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Toyota Blizzard is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Ecosport (109 HP) has 42 more horse power than 1981 Toyota Blizzard. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1981 Toyota Blizzard.
Because 1981 Toyota Blizzard is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Toyota Blizzard will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Toyota Blizzard | 2011 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Toyota | Ford |
| Model | Blizzard | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2188 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2490 mm |
