1981 Toyota Celica vs. 1968 Triumph 2.5
To start off, 1981 Toyota Celica is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2.5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2.5 would be higher. At 2,562 cc, 1981 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Triumph 2.5 (150 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1981 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Triumph 2.5 should accelerate faster than 1981 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Toyota Celica weights approximately 47 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2.5.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Triumph 2.5 (222 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1968 Triumph 2.5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Toyota Celica | 1968 Triumph 2.5 | |
Make | Toyota | Triumph |
Model | Celica | 2.5 |
Year Released | 1981 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2562 cc | 2498 cc |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 215 Nm | 222 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1133 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2700 mm |