1981 Toyota Celica vs. 1970 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1981 Toyota Celica is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,759 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Triumph 2000 (122 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1981 Toyota Celica. (114 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1981 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Toyota Celica weights approximately 30 kg more than 1970 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 1970 Triumph 2000 (207 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Toyota Celica. (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1970 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Toyota Celica | 1970 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Toyota | Triumph |
Model | Celica | 2000 |
Year Released | 1981 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2759 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 207 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1270 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2700 mm |