1981 Toyota Celica vs. 1975 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1981 Toyota Celica is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,759 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Toyota Celica (114 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1975 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1975 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Toyota Celica weights approximately 55 kg more than 1975 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1981 Toyota Celica (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1981 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Toyota Celica | 1975 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Toyota | Triumph |
Model | Celica | 2000 |
Year Released | 1981 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2759 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2700 mm |