1981 Toyota Celica vs. 1997 Volvo C70
To start off, 1997 Volvo C70 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,562 cc, 1981 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Volvo C70 (190 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1981 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1981 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Volvo C70 weights approximately 390 kg more than 1981 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1997 Volvo C70 (270 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1997 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Toyota Celica | 1997 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | Celica | C70 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2562 cc | 2435 cc |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 215 Nm | 270 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1570 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2800 mm |
