1981 Toyota Cressida vs. 1982 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1982 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Toyota Cressida. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Toyota Cressida would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Toyota Cressida is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Toyota Cressida weights approximately 460 kg more than 1982 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1981 Toyota Cressida is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Toyota Cressida. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Toyota Cressida | 1982 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Toyota | Volkswagen |
Model | Cressida | Polo |
Year Released | 1981 | 1982 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1043 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 38 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 59 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 55 L |