1981 Toyota Cressida vs. 2010 Audi A4
To start off, 2010 Audi A4 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Toyota Cressida. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Toyota Cressida would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Audi A4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Audi A4 weights approximately 485 kg more than 1981 Toyota Cressida.
Because 2010 Audi A4 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Toyota Cressida. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi A4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Toyota Cressida | 2010 Audi A4 | |
| Make | Toyota | Audi |
| Model | Cressida | A4 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 211 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1645 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4704 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1826 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1427 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2809 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 64 L |
