1981 Toyota Cressida vs. 2010 Audi A6
To start off, 2010 Audi A6 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Toyota Cressida. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Toyota Cressida would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Toyota Cressida. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Audi A6 has automatic transmission and 1981 Toyota Cressida has manual transmission. 1981 Toyota Cressida will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Audi A6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Toyota Cressida | 2010 Audi A6 | |
| Make | Toyota | Audi |
| Model | Cressida | A6 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 4200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 350 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4934 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1862 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1519 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2833 mm |
