1981 Toyota Cressida vs. 2010 Audi A8
To start off, 2010 Audi A8 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Toyota Cressida. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Toyota Cressida would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Audi A8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Audi A8 weights approximately 840 kg more than 1981 Toyota Cressida.
Because 2010 Audi A8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Toyota Cressida. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi A8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Audi A8 has automatic transmission and 1981 Toyota Cressida has manual transmission. 1981 Toyota Cressida will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Audi A8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Toyota Cressida | 2010 Audi A8 | |
Make | Toyota | Audi |
Model | Cressida | A8 |
Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 4200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 350 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5062 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1895 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1445 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2944 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 90 L |