1981 Toyota Cressida vs. 2012 Audi A6
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Toyota Cressida. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Toyota Cressida would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Audi A6 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Toyota Cressida. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Toyota Cressida | 2012 Audi A6 | |
Make | Toyota | Audi |
Model | Cressida | A6 |
Year Released | 1981 | 2012 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 187 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4915 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2911 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 75 L |