1981 Toyota Cressida vs. 2012 Volkswagen Polo

To start off, 2012 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Toyota Cressida. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Toyota Cressida would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Toyota Cressida is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 109 kg more than 1981 Toyota Cressida.

Because 1981 Toyota Cressida is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Toyota Cressida. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Volkswagen Polo has automatic transmission and 1981 Toyota Cressida has manual transmission. 1981 Toyota Cressida will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Volkswagen Polo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1981 Toyota Cressida 2012 Volkswagen Polo
Make Toyota Volkswagen
Model Cressida Polo
Year Released 1981 2012
Body Type Station Wagon Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1970 cc 1200 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 178 HP
Top Speed 171 km/hour 228 km/hour
Acceleration 0-100mph 13 seconds 6.9 seconds
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1160 kg 1269 kg
Vehicle Length 4690 mm 3970 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1682 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1462 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2470 mm