1981 Toyota Tercel vs. 1956 Volvo P 1900
To start off, 1981 Toyota Tercel is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Volvo P 1900. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Volvo P 1900 would be higher. At 1,414 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Volvo P 1900 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Volvo P 1900 weights approximately 40 kg more than 1981 Toyota Tercel.
Because 1956 Volvo P 1900 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Volvo P 1900. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Toyota Tercel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Toyota Tercel | 1956 Volvo P 1900 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | Tercel | P 1900 |
Year Released | 1981 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1293 cc | 1414 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 62 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 860 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2610 mm |