1981 Volvo 240 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Captiva (135 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1981 Volvo 240. (96 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 1981 Volvo 240.
Because 1981 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Captiva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Captiva (220 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Volvo 240. (127 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Volvo 240 | 2010 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Volvo | Chevrolet |
Model | 240 | Captiva |
Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2127 cc | 2405 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 127 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2710 mm |