1981 Volvo 240 vs. 2010 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 129 more horse power than 1981 Volvo 240. (111 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1981 Volvo 240.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Volvo 240. (185 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Volvo 240 | 2010 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Volvo | Holden |
| Model | 240 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2314 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 111 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 185 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
