1981 Volvo 240 vs. 2012 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2012 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 2,383 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan X-Trail (148 HP) has 67 more horse power than 1981 Volvo 240. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1981 Volvo 240.
Because 2012 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Volvo 240. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Volvo 240 | 2012 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Volvo | Nissan |
| Model | 240 | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2383 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 65 L |
