1981 Volvo 260 vs. 2010 Dodge Avenger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Avenger is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 2,849 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Avenger (173 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1981 Volvo 260. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Avenger should accelerate faster than 1981 Volvo 260.
Because 1981 Volvo 260 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Volvo 260. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Avenger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Volvo 260 (231 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Dodge Avenger. (225 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1981 Volvo 260 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Dodge Avenger.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Volvo 260 | 2010 Dodge Avenger | |
| Make | Volvo | Dodge |
| Model | 260 | Avenger |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2849 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 231 Nm | 225 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4849 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1824 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1496 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2766 mm |
