1981 Volvo 343 vs. 2002 Volvo S60
To start off, 2002 Volvo S60 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Volvo 343. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Volvo 343 would be higher. At 2,319 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo S60 (129 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1981 Volvo 343. (117 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1981 Volvo 343.
Because 1981 Volvo 343 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Volvo 343. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volvo S60 (280 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Volvo 343. (160 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Volvo 343.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Volvo 343 | 2002 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Volvo | Volvo |
Model | 343 | S60 |
Year Released | 1981 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1986 cc | 2319 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 117 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 280 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 93.2 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1440 mm |