1981 Zastava 102 vs. 1965 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1981 Zastava 102 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Zastava 102 (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1965 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102 should accelerate faster than 1965 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Zastava 102 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1965 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1981 Zastava 102 (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1981 Zastava 102 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Zastava 102 | 1965 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Zastava | ZAZ |
| Model | 102 | 966 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1965 |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 887 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 95 Nm | 52 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 770 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2170 mm |
