1981 Zastava 102 vs. 1969 Zastava 1500
To start off, 1981 Zastava 102 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,302 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Zastava 102 (67 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 1500. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102 should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Zastava 1500 weights approximately 206 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102.
Because 1969 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Zastava 102 | 1969 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | Zastava | Zastava |
Model | 102 | 1500 |
Year Released | 1981 | 1969 |
Engine Size | 1302 cc | 1294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 53 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 774 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2430 mm |