1981 Zastava 102 vs. 1974 Audi Fox
To start off, 1981 Zastava 102 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Audi Fox. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Audi Fox would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Audi Fox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Audi Fox (75 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Audi Fox should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Audi Fox weights approximately 138 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Zastava 102 | 1974 Audi Fox | |
| Make | Zastava | Audi |
| Model | 102 | Fox |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1974 |
| Engine Size | 1302 cc | 1588 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 75 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 774 kg | 912 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2550 mm |
