1981 Zastava 102 vs. 1979 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1981 Zastava 102 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,302 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Zastava 102 (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1979 Zastava 1300. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102 should accelerate faster than 1979 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Zastava 1300 weights approximately 186 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102.
Because 1979 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Zastava 102 | 1979 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Zastava | Zastava |
Model | 102 | 1300 |
Year Released | 1981 | 1979 |
Engine Size | 1302 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 774 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2430 mm |