1981 Zastava 102 vs. 1980 Zastava 750
To start off, 1981 Zastava 102 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 1,302 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Zastava 102 (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 750. (30 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102 should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Zastava 102 weights approximately 134 kg more than 1980 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Zastava 102 | 1980 Zastava 750 | |
| Make | Zastava | Zastava |
| Model | 102 | 750 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1980 |
| Engine Size | 1302 cc | 767 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 30 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 774 kg | 640 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2010 mm |
