1981 Zastava 102 vs. 1982 Zastava 750
To start off, 1982 Zastava 750 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Zastava 102 (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Zastava 102 weights approximately 130 kg more than 1982 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1981 Zastava 102 (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 750. (55 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1981 Zastava 102 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 750.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Zastava 102 | 1982 Zastava 750 | |
| Make | Zastava | Zastava |
| Model | 102 | 750 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 95 Nm | 55 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 770 kg | 640 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2010 mm |
