1981 Zastava 102 vs. 2004 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 2004 Suzuki Swift is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,490 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Suzuki Swift is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Suzuki Swift (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Suzuki Swift should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Suzuki Swift weights approximately 210 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Suzuki Swift (133 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Suzuki Swift will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Zastava 102 | 2004 Suzuki Swift | |
| Make | Zastava | Suzuki |
| Model | 102 | Swift |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1490 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 95 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 770 kg | 980 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2400 mm |
