1981 Zastava 102 vs. 2010 BMW 760
To start off, 2010 BMW 760 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2010 BMW 760 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW 760 (535 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 486 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW 760 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 BMW 760 weights approximately 1510 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 BMW 760 (745 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 650 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 BMW 760 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Zastava 102 | 2010 BMW 760 | |
| Make | Zastava | BMW |
| Model | 102 | 760 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 535 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 95 Nm | 745 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Vehicle Weight | 770 kg | 2280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 5215 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1902 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1481 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 3211 mm |
