1981 Zastava 102 vs. 2010 Ford Escape
To start off, 2010 Ford Escape is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford Escape is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Escape (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Escape should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Escape weights approximately 2133 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Escape (474 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 379 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Escape will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Zastava 102 | 2010 Ford Escape | |
| Make | Zastava | Ford |
| Model | 102 | Escape |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 255 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 95 Nm | 474 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Vehicle Weight | 770 kg | 2903 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 5504 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 2017 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 2111 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 3505 mm |
